India's Trusted Legal Directory
Pan-India Presence
support@legalfoster.com
India's Trusted Legal Directory
Pan-India Presence
support@legalfoster.com
Home › Legal News › Criminal Law › illegal arrest warrant cannot result in bail; ke…
Illegal Arrest Warrant Cannot Result in Bail; Kerala HC Explains Legal Position
Criminal Law

Illegal Arrest Warrant Cannot Result in Bail; Kerala HC Explains Legal Position

16 Sep 2026
3 weeks ago
4 min read
Share: 𝕏 Twitter in LinkedIn

Illegal Arrest Warrant Cannot Result in Bail; Kerala HC Explains Legal Position

Kerala High Court News | Criminal Law Update | Arrest and Bail Proceedings
“The procedure to be followed...when an accused approaches the court praying for bail is that the court presumes that arrest is legal. But when the arrest is illegal, granting of bail so as to secure release of the accused is not be the procedure to be followed,” the Kerala High Court said recently.

Writing for itself and Justice PC Phanjoubol, Justice A Badharudeen said when courts find that an accused was illegally arrested, the court cannot release the accused on grant of bail but should release him and relegate him to the pre-arrest stage.

“When an accused seeks bail...the court presumes that he has been arrested by the police and produced before it lawfully. When the arrest is illegal, then granting of bail so as to secure release of the accused person is not be the correct procedure to be followed,” the Court observed while stating that “when the arrest is found to be illegal…for want of compliance of the formalities of arrest, there is no arrest or custody in eye of law and thereby the accused would be relegated to the stage before his arrest”.

“In that stage, granting bail to such accused produced before the court (after) finding the arrest as illegal would not get support from statutory provisions and the courts should not follow the said wrong procedure”, the Kerala High Court ruled.

Granting bail to a municipality engineer arrested in connection with bribery allegations, the High Court said that when the accused applied for bail, “the presumption is that he has been arrested lawfully and taken into custody.”

“The Court after finding the illegality in the arrest proceeded to grant bail and set him free. This course is not correct. The correct course is to set the accused persons free at the stage before his arrest…When releasing the accused from such illegal custody, the court can, with the same order, permit the police to arrest the accused forthwith on compliance of formalities of arrest,” the Court added.

Background of the Case

Jose Dominic was arrested by an armed squad of the Crime Branch CID. Jose sought bail before the High Court which allowed his plea but noted that he had been in jail since July 27. “The investigation has substantially progressed. There is nothing to show that the continuance in custody of the accused is necessary,” the Court noted.

Pointing out that courts routinely allow bail to those illegally arrested, “such course is wrong” the Court said. The accused person should be released by the Court and put back to a pre-arrest stage so that police are free to re-arrest him following due procedure, the High Court clarified.

It further directed that “all Criminal Courts subordinate to the High Court shall see to it that while releasing an illegally arrested person, the Court in its order of release shall clarify that the accused so released is free to move about and the Police is free to arrest the accused the same day after complying with the mandatory arrest formalities.”

Emphasising that “the question of grant of bail, in such cases, would not arise,” the High Court said: “The course open for the court is to set the accused person free at the stage before his arrest. While doing so, in the same order itself the court freeing the accused, produced before the court, shall pass an order to the effect that the release of the accused for non-compliance of the formalities of the arrest shall not be a rider for the arrest of the accused so released by the Police on complying the formalities of the arrest. Permitting the police to arrest the accused so freed, again.”

Lead advocates V John Sebastian Ralph with Vishnu Chandran, Ralph Reti John, Giridhar Krishna Kumar, Geethu TA, Mary Greeshma, Liz Johny, Krishnapriya Sreekumar, Abhijith PS, Devika Manoj and Ashuthosh P Kamath appeared for Jose. Senior public prosecutor Roy Thomas (Muvattupuzha) appeared for the state.



👮
LF Editorial Desk
Legal News Team · LegalFoster
Curated and verified by India's dedicated legal journalism team. Our editors track Supreme Court, High Court, NCLT, DRT and regulatory developments daily to keep practitioners and citizens informed.
← Back to Legal News More Criminal Law →
Expert Legal Consultation

Online Legal Consultation – Frequently Asked Questions

Legal Foster is a legal information and professional discovery platform that helps people explore lawyers, law firms, legal services and legal resources.

Use the lawyer directory to browse verified profiles by practice area, city or court, then review the available profile information before making contact.

Yes. Legal Foster provides dedicated city, practice-area and court-wise directory pages using its existing lawyer database.

Legal Foster provides general legal information and discovery tools. Information on the portal is not a substitute for advice from a qualified legal professional.

Use only the official contact and enquiry channels shown on Legal Foster. Individual professionals are responsible for explaining how they handle information shared with them.

Legal support

Need Immediate Legal Help?

Connect with legal professionals and explore the right service for your matter.

Verified profilesDirect enquiriesPan-India directory
Talk to a LawyerGet Help