India's Trusted Legal Directory
Pan-India Presence
support@legalfoster.com
India's Trusted Legal Directory
Pan-India Presence
support@legalfoster.com
Home Legal News High Court bombay high court grants interim relief to shrut…
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Shruti Haasan in AI Deepfake Case
High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Shruti Haasan in AI Deepfake Case

03 Sep 2026
2 hours ago
4 min read
Share: 𝕏 Twitter in LinkedIn
Legal News
Bombay High Court | AI Deepfake Case
Legal News

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Shruti Haasan in AI Deepfake Case

Actress Shruti Haasan had filed a plea seeking protection of her personality rights.

In an interim order on Shruti Haasan’s plea seeking directions to restrain AI generated contents infringing her personality rights by misuse of her identity or likeness, the Bombay High Court has granted ad-interim relief to the actress.

Actress Shruti Haasan had moved the Court pleading for protection of her personality and publicity rights. According to Haasan, her personality rights have been violated by unauthorized AI generated deepfakes of her photos and videos and morphed videos misusing her identity for creating artificial intelligence chatbots commercial endorsement. Sharing of her images on social media without authorization and selling merchandise without her consent also infringed her publicity rights.

In his interim order, Justice Madhav Jamdar acknowledged the serious damages which are caused due to digitally altered images and deepfakes online.

“The court finds merit in the plaintiff’s (Haasan’s) submissions that the continuous posting and proliferation of AI generated deepfakes/morphed images/videos of the plaintiff along with chatbots and any other infringing material on the internet and social media has caused and continues to cause irreparable damage and injury to the plaintiff’s reputation and goodwill and commercial interests. Damages would not be an adequate remedy as the same cannot be ascertained. Once uploaded on the worldwide web, deepfake material can go viral and be shared and circulated across numerous websites and derives, which can never be recalled. Therefore, there would be permanent dilution of plaintiff’s personality rights, trade libel and public image,” the Court said.

The judge further noted that Haasan’s plea for protection of her privacy and personality rights has been backed by the Constitution.

“The material relied upon by plaintiff it does show that (Haasan’s) personality rights/publicity rights and moral rights are infringed by uploading of said morphed/deepfake/superimposed contents consisting of morphed pictures/images/photographs/videos of plaintiff. The plaintiff’s personality rights/publicity rights are guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) read with Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India which deals with the right to freedom of speech and expression. The right to privacy is sub-secreted in the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The right to life as envisaged under Article 21 includes the right to live with dignity. Thus, a very strong prima facie case is made out,” the Bench added.

The Court further issued directions to block the URLs mentioned by Haasan in her plea.

Key Development

Haasan had filed a suit last month praying for relief against various respondents who are creators, publishers, hosts, platforms and websites for posting content that used her identity without authorization.

During the previous hearing, the Bombay High Court had given last chance to some of the defendants who have failed to file a reply or enter an appearance so far.

Considering that several respondents still failed to enter an appearance or file a defence even after multiple weeks of granting them last chance, the Court now moved to grant ad-interim relief.

The counsel appearing for few of the defendants who had appeared for the proceedings assured the Court that AI deepfake contents would be taken down from their platforms as soon as they receive URLs in a legible format from Haasan’s lawyers.

Senior Advocates Rashmin Khandekar with advocates Ameet Naik, Madhu Gadodia, Aman Saraf, Malabika and Unnati Gambani of Anand & Naik practised for Haasan.



⚖️
LF Editorial Desk
Legal News Team · LegalFoster
Curated and verified by India's dedicated legal journalism team. Our editors track Supreme Court, High Court, NCLT, DRT and regulatory developments daily to keep practitioners and citizens informed.
← Back to Legal News More High Court →
Expert Legal Consultation

Online Legal Consultation – Frequently Asked Questions

Legal Foster is a legal information and professional discovery platform that helps people explore lawyers, law firms, legal services and legal resources.

Use the lawyer directory to browse verified profiles by practice area, city or court, then review the available profile information before making contact.

Yes. Legal Foster provides dedicated city, practice-area and court-wise directory pages using its existing lawyer database.

Legal Foster provides general legal information and discovery tools. Information on the portal is not a substitute for advice from a qualified legal professional.

Use only the official contact and enquiry channels shown on Legal Foster. Individual professionals are responsible for explaining how they handle information shared with them.

Legal support

Need Immediate Legal Help?

Connect with legal professionals and explore the right service for your matter.

Verified profilesDirect enquiriesPan-India directory
Talk to a LawyerGet Help